ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« Leadership? Change. Now. | Main | Referendum »

April 30, 2004

Education, education, education

It's one thing to meet a target, and quite a different matter altogether to maintain the standard, something the Secretary of State for Education is now discovering. Labour was elected in 1997 with a manifesto promise that class sizes for 5, 6 and 7 year olds would be no bigger than 30 pupils, this target to be attained by 2002. In what is now becoming an increasingly rare display of competance, the target was met.

Since then according to the DfES the situation has worsened, with more than 23,000 pupils being taught in groups of 30 or more, an increase of nearly 6,000 over the previous year, a situation exacerbated by the loos of 800 primary teachers.

"But hey" I hear you say, "the Government keeps going on about the increasing numbers of teachers. Are they lying?". Well the answer to that is no and yes. Last year the number of teachers did rise by 4,200 to nearly 428,000, but of the rise only 1,800 were extra qualified teachers, with the balance of 2,400 due to working trainees and overseas staff.

Furthermore, the DfES claims that only 38 classes broke the rules, as the others had been allowed to exceed the 30-pupil ceiling for a variety of reasons. However from my experience, I have seen a number of fiddles whereby the real class size is being disguised, by placing children on the register for a different class for example. So I suspect that the real scale of the issue is greater than the DfES reports. The bottom line is that the Government has used the demographic changes leading to falling rolls not as an opportunity to reduce class sizes, but instead as a way of making cost savings by reducing teacher numbers. Not the best way to improve standards in primary education.


--------

Posted by Clive on April 30, 2004 4:55 PM in the category Old Stuff

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/388


Comments

Comments Closed