ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« Labour Needs New Leadership | Main | Reasons to be fearful #1 »

April 28, 2004

Railways

So Jarvis and Network Rail have admitted liability for the Potters Bar crash in which seven people died. At first sight, it might seem good news that the organisations involved have accepted responsibility for the accident, but then you check the small print...

A Jarvis spokesman added the move did not mean the firm was to blame for the accident, which killed seven people.

In fact all Jarvis have done is agreed joint liability for the compensation claims, whilst continuing to protest their innocence. Personally I share Bob Crowe's sense of disbelief...

"This is a nonsense. How can they accept liability without accepting responsibility?"

Indeed. After all, according to my dictionary:

liability (n) 1. the state of being liable.
liable (adj) 1. Legally obliged or responsible; answerable.

It would be no different if you saw a road accident, but were not involved, however you gave those involved your insurance details so they could claim off you.

I suspect that the motivation here is to try and push the whole matter out of the public eye in the hope that it will be forgotten. With more and more railway maintenance work being taken in-house, companies such as Jarvis, who thrived on rail contracts under privatisation, will need to look elsewhere for business. Having the legacy of Potters Bar hanging around doesn't make for a good advert.

Meanwhile after nearly 2 years and 3 interim reports, the HSE has still not yet identified the root cause of the accident. Let me give them a clue: look who pushed through railway privatisation, because there's the root cause.


--------

Posted by Clive on April 28, 2004 11:08 AM in the category Old Stuff

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/397


Comments

Comments Closed