ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« The Big Intervention - Update | Main | Iraq »

June 17, 2004

Immigration

The National Audit Office today reported on Visa Entry to the UK and it should make for unsettling reading at the Home Office. In spite of all th spin and bluster; in spite of attempts to downplay the fiasco by using phrases such as insufficiently robust; in spite of persistant denials even after Beverley Hughes resignation; in spite of attempts to portray anyone wishing to discuss weaknesses in the immigration system as racist; in spite of all this the Home Office overruled UKvisas in 90% of applications from Romania and Bulgaria. The report is critical of the Home Office's failure to communicate adequately, such that in many cases where it over-ruled UKvisas, no explanation was given, but instead a basic "issue the visa" letter was sent.

As for Blunkett, well the report from the NAO does nothing to improve perception of his role in the whole sorry mess. The NAO report does effectively refute the claim that the Home Office were simply waving immigrants through in an effort to fiddle the figures. And the Sutton Report, while admiting that there were abuses also states that ministers were not aware of them. Which is pretty damning for Blunkett as the only remaining conclusion is that system was out of control and ministers were totally unaware.

The bottom line is that the emotive nature of immigration is going to make the definition and implementation of sensible policy a challenge, but that is not an excuse for poor communication, incompetence and dishonesty from department heads and ministers. And dishonesty is an accusation that Blunkett will find hard to avoid. Suspicion continues that Blunkett misled MPs and neither the NAO report nor the Sutton findings do anything to either confirm or refute such allegations. We may never know just how much (or little) the Home Secretary knew, but if evidence ever comes to light showing that he was aware of the scale of problems, then he may wish he'd resigned at the same time as Ms Hughes.


--------

Posted by Clive on June 17, 2004 12:31 PM in the category Old Stuff

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/305


Comments

Comments Closed