ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« Wimps | Main | The Big Intervention »

August 25, 2004

Sudan

Well things are looking no clearer with regard to British involvement in the crisis in Darfur. On the positive side, it is a relief that Blair has dropped any idea of direct military intervention by British forces, an approach that left me filled with dread.

But that's about it for positives. For starters, anyone listening to Jack Straw speaking in Darfur would be left with the abiding impression that British policy was now to take a softly, softly approach, giving Khartoum more time to act rather than keeping up the pressure on the GoS. Now the UN deadline runs out on Monday, and it will be interesting to see what Britain's stance is with regard to sanctions. My suspicion is that there will be some serious back-pedalling, considering statements such as:

My core message to the president was that the UK’s interests and the interests of the international community are the same as those of the president and government of Sudan

Hardly the strongest of language there. And according to British officials, a UN embargo on oil exports is unlikely to be called for by the UN Security Council. Which makes Jack Straw's denial that the international community was going soft on Sudan appear a little disingeneous. The African Union is trying to resolve the situation, but any weakening in the resolve of the international community will undermine their efforts, and the Union needs all the support it can get.


--------

Posted by Clive on August 25, 2004 11:33 AM in the category Old Stuff

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/227


Comments

Comments Closed