ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« Bush Revisit(ed) | Main | Terror »

November 15, 2004

Role Reversal

Politicians have a tendency to rely on weasel words, whilst the military is known for plain talking (well, except for the US Armed Forces who seem to have a whole division dedicated to dressing up unpleasant truths in fancy words - Collateral Damage anyone?).

Which makes the little spat between Tony Blair and Chief of the General Staff, General Sir Mike Jackson all the more entertaining for the role reversal it depicts.

On the one hand we have Tony Blair who, through masterful and visionary decision making, managed to dig himself a hole by sending the Black Watch to do his political dirty work for Bush at the same time as the regiment's merger with other Scottish regiments was announced. Seeing what a screw up he'd made of the whole matter, Blair apparently went cap-in-hand and asked General Jackson to get him out of a hole.

Which, for Blair, is pretty straight talk.

General Jackson's reply was straight from one of the Army's manuals, Selection and retention of aim is a fundamental principle of war. Or in other words, tough shit, you made the decision now stick with it.

Still, in spite of his general air of uselessness and incompetance, at least Geoff Hoon managed to maintain the tradition of political evasion (if not the tradition of the Black Watch), Certainly, it is within a very reasonable probability that that formula you have described, where the name of a historic regiment is part of its ultimate title, is something that clearly is a proper solution to this issue. Which translated means We'll try and keep the name in use regardless and hope that the public don't catch on and realise that the regiment has been thoroughly buggered by us. All being well it won't cost us too much support north of the Border and I can keep my job.

Now this whole matter poses a dilemma. Personally I can see both sides of the debate regarding the regiments and their consolidation, but would like to see units such as the Black Watch retain their identity. But at the same time I'd like to see Blair comprehensively embarrased by the whole matter. Tough call.


--------

Posted by Clive on November 15, 2004 5:12 PM in the category Old Stuff

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/149


Comments

Comments Closed