ARCHIVE
View by Date

March 2008 
sun mon tue wed thu fri sat
            1
2 3 4 5 6 7 8
9 10 11 12 13 14 15
16 17 18 19 20 21 22
23 24 25 26 27 28 29
30 31          

CATEGORIES

    Conservative (10)
    Cool Stuff (1)
    Education (4)
    Labour (30)
    Miscellany (4)
    Old Stuff (667)
    Personal (6)
    Politics (26)
    Religion (5)
    Society (24)
    Technology (2)
    Terror (25)
    The Internet (14)
    War (18)


INFORMERS

Bloggerheads
Bob Piper
Chicken Yoghurt
Criticise.Me.Uk
Dave Weeden: Backword
Downing Street Says
Europhobia
Freedom and Whisky
Howlingspoons
MailWatch
Me and Ophelia
Ministry of Truthk
Nick Barlow
Perfect.co.uk
Peter Gasston
Samizdata
Simon Carr
The London News Review
The Skakagrall
The Yorkshire Ranter
UK Polling Report


ENTERTAINERS

Scaryduck
The Early Days of a Better Nation
Charlie Stross
Rikaitch
Supermum
The Urban Badger
The Six Dwarfs
Life in the Crescent
The Joy of Raki
Ye Olde Plague Blog
Rhyme or Reason?
Amstelladagain
Jewssansfrontieres
Bedsit Bomber
Doctor Vee


ALTERNATIVES

George Monbiot
Green Health - Richard Lawson


LABOUR ACTIVISM

Labour Conference 2004
Campaign for Labour Party Democracy
Labour Campaign for Open Local Government
Save the Labour Party
Labour Reform
Labour Left Briefing
Network of Socialist Campaign Groups
Socialist Campaign Group of Labour MPs
Centre-Left Grassroots Alliance
Chartist
Campaign for Socialism (Scotland)


    RSS | RSD | Atom

« Luke 6:41-42 | Main | Strange Bedfellows »

January 23, 2006

Big Brother - Bigger than what?

Is our society really so stuffed that a TV show can be considered more important than an issue directly affecting thousands of lives, or above the due process of the law?

Week before last, I made reference to George Galloway's presence in the Big Brother house getting in the way of his representing his constituents in the CrossRail debate in Parliament.

In the latest development - and I'm not refering to Essex slapper Chantelle being up for eviction - lawyers representing Michael Barrymore are trying to get the Lubbock family's private prosecution adjourned until Barrymore either wins the competition or is evicted from the BB house.

Big Brother makers Endemol Productions have not given legal representatives access to Mr Barrymore during the show.

So not only does the family of Stuart Lubbock have to face Barrymore parading himself on Big Brother, but now they may have to wait longer for an opportunity to seek closure in the matter of Stuart's death. Big Brother is a tawdry excuse for entertainment which has about as much in common with "reality" as religion does with truth. Yet Endemol see no need to consider any higher authorities.

Indeed, had there been anyone at Endemol with any conscience at all, they would never have approached Galloway or Barrymore with a view to their participation on Big Brother. Or, having been approached themselves, Endemol could (and should) have exercised some judgement and turned them down.

Though maybe I shouldn't be so harsh. If they as a company consider Barrymore and Galloway et al, to be appropriate participants, it is only because the viewers of Big Brother themselves can see nothing wrong in their presence in the BB House.

In which case it is possible that Big Brother does reflect reality, a reality in which a significant number of people consider justice and democracy to be trivial in comparison to the entertainment provided by a televised freak show.

Posted by Clive on January 23, 2006 12:33 PM in the category Society

Trackbacks
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://www.theuktoday.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt-tbuk-x.pl/720


Comments

Comments Closed